Home
Site Map
Legal
Publications
Join Us
Contact Us

 

 
Education Otherwise Response to White Paper

Higher Standards, Better Schools for All - More Choice for Parents and Pupils

The government has announced proposals in its School's White Paper, published in October, to introduce a new statutory duty on all Local Authorities to make arrangements to identify children missing from education. The Government Policy Team of Education Otherwise has written to the Department for Education and Skills in response to the proposal as follows:

"We have serious concerns about how LEAs might interpret and act on a mandatory duty to identify children whose educational status is unknown.

In the UK parents have the responsibility to ensure that their children receive efficient full-time education. Successive Education Acts have made it clear that this is the parents' responsibility and that it can be fulfilled either by sending children to school or otherwise. Home educators therefore have the freedom to educate their children at home in any way they choose providing that it is suitable to the age, ability and aptitude of their children, and to any special educational needs those children might have. Parents are not required to register with an LEA, nor to provide information about their educational provision simply because they are home educating.

If it becomes mandatory for LEAs to identify children missing from education then LEAs will have a duty to investigate children whose educational status is unknown. This will result in effective registration of all home educators, and removes the current freedom of parents to educate their children "otherwise" without interference from the state.

We regard the removal of freedoms from citizens by government to be a serious matter which should not be embarked on without good cause. If the freedom to educate children without state interference is to be eroded because of concerns about child welfare we believe that safeguards must be included in statute to protect the privacy of home educating families, and to prevent discrimination against parents who choose to educate their children at home. Therefore we suggest that any future guidance or statute obliging LEAs or any other agencies to identify children missing from education should also instruct these agencies to take no further action if the parents of a child who they believed might be missing from education indicate that the child is being educated at home.

Furthermore it is essential that all documentation issued in connection with the identification of children missing from education should explicitly state that home education is legal and is not a cause for concern or suspicion. It must be made clear to any professionals who have contact with children that children being educated at home are not missing from education and that there is no need to report these children as children missing from education. Any officials involved in gathering and processing data for the identification of children missing from education must be made aware that home education is equal in statute to school education and must not be treated differently in the identification process."

 
Back to Consultation Index
   
 
Rhye
Internet
Solutions Limited