A Summary of the Law Relating to
Home Education in England and Wales (4th Edition)
|
For ease of printing, pdf text version
of this document available to print here
|
School is not Compulsory
|
|
In England and Wales parents have the primary responsibility
for ensuring that their children receive an effective education.
Although this responsibility is usually delegated to schools some
parents choose to exercise it directly by providing an education
based at home.
[## NEW ## ]
In November 2007 the Department for Children Schools and
Families produced written guidelines on home education for local authorities
which may be found here [ http://www.dfes.gov.uk/localauthorities/_documents/content/7373-DCSF-Elective%20Home%20Education.pdf
]
The following summarises the legal responsibilities of parents
and local authorities in relation to elective home education of
children of compulsory school age.
|
|
CONTENTS
RESPONSIBILITY OF PARENTS
DEFINITION OF SUITABLE EDUCATION
DUTY OF LOCAL AUTHORITIES
DISPUTES BETWEEN PARENTS AND LOCAL AUTHORITIES
DEREGISTRATION IN ENGLAND
DEREGISTRATION IN WALES
FLEXI-SCHOOLING
HOME EDUCATING CHILDREN WITH SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL
NEEDS
|
|
Responsibility of Parents
The responsibility of parents is clearly established in section
7 of the Education Act 1996 (previously section 36 of the Education
Act 1944):
The parent of every child of compulsory school age shall cause
him to receive efficient full-time education suitable
|
| |
- to his age, ability and aptitude, and
- to any special educational needs he may have, either by regular
attendance at school or otherwise.
|
|
|
Definition of Suitable Education
An interpretation of some terminology used in the Education Act
1944 (replaced by the 1996 Act) was provided by an appeal case which
was brought at Worcester Crown Court in 1981 (Harrison & Harrison
v Stevenson). In this case, the judge defined a ‘suitable
education’ as one which was such as:
|
| |
1. to prepare the children for life in modern civilised society,
and
2. to enable them to achieve their full potential. |
|
| The diversity of modern society and styles of education
give parents considerable freedom of choice in enabling children to
achieve their potential. In the case of R v Secretary of State for
Education and Science, ex parte Talmud Torah Machzikei Hadass School
Trust (1985) (Times, 12 April 1985) Mr Justice Woolf held that: |
| |
education is ‘suitable’ if it primarily equips a child
for life within the community of which he is a member, rather than
the way of life in the country as a whole, as long as it does not
foreclose the child’s options in later years to adopt some other
form of life if he wishes to do so. |
|
|
Examining the meaning of the expression full-time
shows the hours spent on teaching in schools are not relevant to
home education, which generally takes place on a one-to-one basis,
or in small groups, in very different conditions.
Provided the child is not a registered pupil at a school, the parent
is not required to provide any particular type of education, and
is under no obligation to
|
| |
- have premises equipped to any particular standard
- have any specific qualifications
- cover the same syllabus as any school
- adopt the National Curriculum
- make detailed plans in advance
- observe school hours, days or terms
- have a fixed timetable
- give formal lessons
- reproduce school type peer group socialisation
- match school, age-specific standards
- seek permission to educate 'otherwise'
- take the initiative in informing the local authority
- have regular contact with the local authority
|
|
|
[## NEW ## ]
More information about this
may be found on page 10
of the Government's 2007 Home Education
Guidelines [ http://www.dfes.gov.uk/localauthorities/_documents/content/7373-DCSF-Elective%20Home%20Education.pdf
]
Duty of Local Authorities
Sections 437 to 443 of the Education Act 1996 place a duty upon
local education authorities to take certain actions if it appears
that a child is not being properly educated.
|
| |
If it appears to a local education authority that a child of compulsory
school age in their area is not receiving suitable education, either
by regular attendance at school or otherwise, they shall serve a notice
in writing on the parent requiring him to satisfy them within the
period specified in the notice that the child is receiving such education.
(s 437 (1)) |
|
|
The local authority’s legal duty is concerned
solely with children who appear not to be receiving suitable education.
Beyond this, nothing in the Act requires a local authority to carry
out regular monitoring of provision where a child is receiving education
otherwise than at school.
However, case law (Phillips v Brown, Divisional Court [20 June
1980, unreported]) has established that a local authority may initially
ask parents who are educating their children at home for information
in order to assess whether it appears to the local authority that
no suitable education is being provided.
In Phillips v Brown, Lord Donaldson said:
|
| |
Of course such a request is not the same as a notice under s 37
(1) of the Education Act 1944 [now s 437 (1) of the Education Act
1996] and the parents will be under no duty to comply. However it
would be sensible for them to do so. If parents give no information
or adopt the course … of merely stating that they are discharging
their duty without giving any details of how they are doing so, the
LEA will have to consider and decide whether it ‘appears’
to it that the parents are in breach of s 36 [now s 7 of the Education
Act 1996]. |
|
| If a local authority chooses to approach a family and
informally ask for information, parents may establish that a child
is receiving an efficient and suitable education in a number of ways.
Parents might, for example, offer either |
| |
- a written report,
- samples of work,
- a meeting at their home, with or without the child being present,
- a meeting elsewhere, with or without the child,
- an endorsement of the educational provision by a recognised
third party, or
- information in any other appropriate form
|
|
| The DfES make it clear that parents have a choice about
how they provide information about their educational provision: |
| |
LAs have no automatic right of access to parents' homes. Parents
may wish to offer an alternative way of demonstrating that they are
providing suitable education, for example through showing examples
of work and agreeing to a meeting at another venue. |
|
Elective Home Education |
|
Occasionally, after examining all the information provided by the
parents, a local authority may have genuine concerns about a child’s
education, but the way that information is presented should not
form the basis for these concerns. Parents need only present information
that would, on the balance of probabilities, convince a reasonable
person that a suitable education was being provided.
Disputes Between Parents and Local Authorities
It should be possible to resolve most disputes without recourse
to formal statutory procedures. However, where children of compulsory
school age are not being educated at school and the local authority
has serious doubts about the parents’ educational provision,
the following scenario will apply.
Initially, the local authority asks informally for information
and gives the parents reasonable time to provide it.
Then in the light of any response it considers whether it appears
that the child is not receiving suitable education. Unless at this
point the answer is 'Yes, it does appear that the child is not receiving
suitable education,' no further steps should be taken.
If, after considering all the information provided by the parents,
the local authority is concerned that the child may not be receiving
suitable education, it should explain this to the family and give
them further time and opportunity to explain or improve their arrangements.
Only after this, if it still appears to the local authority that
the child is not receiving suitable education, should it take the
first step towards a school attendance order. This step will be
to serve a formal notice giving the parents two weeks to satisfy
it about the suitability of their provision.
The local authority should bear in mind, however, that should the
case proceed to court the action will fail if the parents can satisfy
the court that they are providing a suitable education. The court
will accept evidence in a number of forms and will be looking for
evidence that would convince a reasonable person on the balance
of probabilities (rather than beyond all reasonable doubt) that
a suitable education is being provided.
At any stage during this process the parents may present evidence
that they are now providing a suitable education and apply to have
the order revoked.
Deregistration in England
In England the Education (Pupil Registration) (England) Regulations
2006 set out the conditions under which a pupil’s name must
be removed from the admission register of a school. Under Regulation
8(1)(d), the name of a school-age pupil is to be deleted from the
admission register if:
|
| |
he has ceased to attend the school and the proprietor has received
written notification from the parent that the pupil is receiving education
otherwise than at school. |
|
|
Parents of children who have been registered at a school and who
begin home education need to inform the school that they are providing
education otherwise than at school so that the child’s name
can be removed from the register. Parents do not need to ask permission
from the local authority to begin home education and they are under
no obligation to inform the local authority of their intention.
Under Regulation 12(3), however, the proprietor of the school must
report the deletion of the pupil's name from the admission register
to the local authority immediately. Guidance on the Regulations
allows schools to delay the removal of the child’s name from
the register for a maximum of two days to allow notification to
reach the local authority.
Parents seeking to home educate children registered at a special
school, however, must obtain the consent of the local authority
to withdraw their child from the school (Education (Pupil Registration)
(England) Regulation 8(2), 2006). Consent is required in these cases
only to smooth the transition to home education for children with
complex special needs. The regulations are not intended to be a
hindrance to these children being educated at home and any such
suggestion would be discriminatory.
Deregistration in Wales
In Wales the Education (Pupil Registration) Regulations, 1995 set
out the conditions under which a pupil’s name must be removed
from the admission register of a school. Under Regulation 9(1)(c),
the name of a school-age pupil is to be deleted immediately from
the admission register if:
|
| |
he has ceased to attend the school and the proprietor has received
written notification from the parent that the pupil is receiving education
otherwise than at school. |
|
|
Parents of children who have been registered at a school and who
begin home education need to inform the school that they are providing
education otherwise than at school so that the child’s name
can be removed from the register. Parents do not need to ask permission
from the local authority to begin home education and, they are under
no obligation to inform the local authority of their intention.
Under Regulation 13(3), however, the proprietor of the school must
report the deletion of the pupil's name from the admission register
to the local authority within ten school days.
Parents seeking to home educate children registered at a special
school, however, must obtain the consent of the local authority
to withdraw their child from the school (Education (Pupil Registration)
Regulation 9(2), 1995). Consent is required in these cases only
to smooth the transition to home education for children with complex
special needs. The regulations are not intended to be a hindrance
to these children being educated at home and any such suggestion
would be discriminatory.
Flexi-Schooling
An increasing number of parents are requesting a more flexible
use of schools, and head teachers have the authority to agree flexi-schooling
to accommodate their wishes. In a flexi-schooling arrangement children
are registered as pupils at the school and attend part-time, but
spend other parts of the week being educated off site by their parents.
This arrangement is a matter for the head teacher, rather than the
local authority, to negotiate with parents.
In England flexi-schooling is covered by the Education (Pupil Registration)
(England) Regulations 2006. Regulation 6(1)(a)(iii) instructs schools
to indicate on the register when children are attending an approved
educational activity off site. Regulation 6(4) defines an approved
educational activity as an activity which takes place outside the
school premises and which is approved by a person authorised by
the proprietor of the school. It must be of an educational nature,
including work experience and sporting activities, and must be supervised
by a person authorised by the proprietor or the head teacher of
the school. Part time education provided at home in agreement with
the head teacher of the school meets these criteria.
[## NEW ## ]
The Department of Children Schools and Families has set out
the Government's views about flexi-schooling on page 17 of the 2007 guidelines
on home education [http://www.dfes.gov.uk/localauthorities/_documents/content/7373-DCSF-Elective%20Home%20Education.pdf]
In Wales flexi-schooling is covered by the Education (Pupil Registration)
Regulations 1995 as amended by the Education (Pupil Registration)
(Amendment) Regulations 1997. Regulation 7(1)(a) instructs schools
to indicate on the register when children are attending an approved
educational activity. Regulation 7(4A)(a) defines an approved educational
activity as an activity which takes place outside the school premises
and which is approved by a person authorised by the proprietor of
the school. It must be of an educational nature, including work
experience and sporting activities, and must be supervised by a
person authorised by the proprietor or the head teacher of the school.
Part time education provided at home in agreement with the head
teacher of the school meets these criteria
Children being educated within a flexi-schooling arrangement are
in the same position as any registered pupil as regards insurance
coverage and also attract full funding for the school.
|
|
Home Educating Children with Special Educational Needs
The right to home educate a child with special educational needs
(SEN) is stated in section 7 of the Education Act 1996:
|
| |
The parent of every child of compulsory school age shall cause
him to receive efficient full-time education suitable
- to his age, ability and aptitude, and
- to any special educational needs he may have, either by regular
attendance at school or otherwise.
|
|
[ ## NEW ## ]
You can find more information about home education and SEN
on pages 11-12 of the 2007 Government Guidelines on Home Education [ hyperlink
http://www.dfes.gov.uk/localauthorities/_documents/content/7373-DCSF-Elective%20Home%20Education.pdf
]
The responsibilities of parents who are home educating a child with
special educational needs are the same as those of any other parents,
whether or not the child has a statement. The government has made
it clear that parents of children with statements do not need to arrange
the provision specified in the statement but need only make suitable
provision under s 7 of the Act, and it encourages local authorities
to recognise that provision at home will be different from provision
at school. Baroness Ashton of Upholland stated in the Lords on October
29th 2001 (Hansard Column 1261): |
| |
However, we do not suggest that parents must carry out exactly what
is written within the statement. It is for the LEAs and the parents
to work together to ensure that the child receives suitable provision,
recognising that provision within a school is different to that provided
at home. |
|
|
Where a child does have a statement of special educational needs
and begins home education, the local authority’s statutory
duty to undertake an annual review continues. This review includes
assessing whether the statement is still appropriate and it may
be possible to alter or even cease to maintain the statement depending
on the child’s current circumstances. Should it be necessary
for the statement to remain in force, the parents continue to have
responsibility for the education provided and the local authority
has a duty to act if it appears that the child is not receiving
a suitable education under s 7.
At times there may be disagreements between parents and the local
authority about how a child's special educational needs should be
met. There are some situations in which parents can appeal to the
independent Special Educational Needs Tribunal. However where this
is the case, then the local authority would have a legal duty to
inform the parent of their right of appeal.
Parents of children with special educational needs do not need
to have any special qualifications or training to assume direct
responsibility for their children’s education. Furthermore,
they do not need to inform the local authority of their intention
to home-educate unless the child is registered at a special school
when the consent of the local authority is necessary to withdraw
the child from the school. Consent is required in these cases only
to smooth the transition to home education for children with complex
special needs and it would be discriminatory for a local authority
to withhold consent where a parent wishes to home educate a child
who is registered at a special school.
|
| |
| Back to Index |