Do I need permission to home educate?
Parents have a legal right to home educate their children instead
of sending them to school; they do not have to justify their decision,
nor wait for approval of their educational plans.
The laws concerning parents’ and LAs’ rights and responsibilities
and interpretations of the law in these matters are summarised elsewhere
(see leaflet Legal Aspects of Home-education in the EO
Information Leaflet Series). Ideas about the different methods used
in education at home are also covered elsewhere (see leaflet Choosing
your Approach to Home-education in the EO Information Leaflet
Series).
Informing the Local Authority
Unless a child is currently registered at a school, parents are
under no obligation to inform anyone of their decision to home educate.
This would include under fives who have never attended a school,
those who are leaving a particular school anyway because of moving
home or those who have completed primary schooling. For children
at school who have not yet reached compulsory school age, parents
can simply inform the school that they are leaving. (Compulsory
school age begins on the first of three fixed dates to fall on or
after the child's fifth birthday. These dates are 31 August, 31
December and 31 March.)
Deregistration from School
Parents of school-age children who are registered at a school
must write and tell the head teacher that the child is receiving
education otherwise than at school. (It is important to write 'is
receiving,' and not 'will be receiving' or 'we are going to home
educate.')
On written notification that the parent is educating ‘otherwise’,
a school is obliged to deregister the child in accordance with Education
(Pupil Registration) Regulation 8(1)(d), 2006 and must also inform
the LA of the situation (Regulation 12(3)). Failure to delete a
child's name from the admission register immediately on request
under this regulation is a criminal offence rendering the proprietor
of the school liable to a fine.
Parents are advised to keep a copy of their letter to the headteacher,
and a record of all other communications (written and verbal) with
both the school and the LA, at all stages of the deregistration
and home education process.
Sample Letter to Head teacher (essential)
Your Address
The Date
Dear Mr Taylor
Re: Catherine Jones (date of birth)
After careful consideration I/we have decided to withdraw my/our
daughter from school in order to take personal responsibility for
her education. Please delete her name from the register in accordance
with Education (Pupil Registration) Regulation 8 (1) (d) 2006, as
she is now receiving education otherwise than at school.
Yours, etc.
If the family’s relationship with school has been friendly,
parents might wish to add some further explanation of their decision
and perhaps acknowledge appreciation of the school’s support
in the past. Similarly, if also choosing to write to the Director
of Education, parents may wish to point out that the school was
helpful.
If, however, parents feel an issue such as bullying was not treated
with the serious consideration it deserves, it is worth highlighting
the problem as constructively as possible to both the school and
LA, which may help other families in the future.
If there is a problem with deregistration, the law in this respect
is set out fully in a leaflet on Deregistration for LEAs and
Schools, available by email
or on paper by sending stamped s.a.e. + extra 2nd class stamp per
copy to Education Otherwise, PO Box 325, Kings Lynn, PE34 3XW. It
may also be downloaded
from EO’s website.
It is not necessary to write to the LEA and few families choose
to do this, but it can be an opportunity to state how you would
like to give the LEA information about your home education provision.
Sample Letter to LA (optional)
Your address
The date
Ms R. Clark, Director of Education
Barsetshire County Council
Dear Ms Clark
Re: Catherine Jones (date of birth)
After careful consideration we have decided to withdraw our daughter
from (name of school) in order to take personal responsibility for
her education otherwise than at school.
We are providing a home and community based approach to learning
in accordance with our legal rights under section 7 of the Education
Act 1996.
We have written to the school about our decision and we understand
that it is the school’s duty to delete Catherine's name from
the register as required by Education (Pupil Registration) Regulation
8(1)(d), 2006.
You might wish to add one or more of the following:
(a) We will provide you with a statement of our educational
provision in due course.
(b) We are happy to discuss an appropriate way for us to respond
to your informal enquiries about our educational provision.
(c) We are planning to write a detailed report on our educational
philosophy and will send it to you shortly. We would prefer
that you do not visit our home
(d) Please give us a few weeks to establish our home education
before making an appointment to visit us.
Yours, etc.
LA Procedures
On being informed of the position, the LA may send a standard
letter and guidance if they have them. These are very variable in
the friendliness of their approach. If the letter/forms ask for
timetables or curriculum, families may reply that they are aware
that home education does not have to mirror a school-type education
in order to be ‘suitable’; that they need time to consider
all aspects and to establish their child's individual current aptitudes
and abilities, and that they may need to allow time and patience
for a school-anxious child to ‘convalesce’ until fear
has subsided and motivation for learning returns.
(For interpretations of ‘suitable’ etc. and the variety
of possible approaches, see leaflets Legal Aspects of Home education
and Choosing your Approach to Home-education in the EO
Information Leaflet Series.)
Some LAs give the impression that a home visit is the only way
they can fulfil their legal obligations. This is not necessarily
so. It is up to parents to choose how they will inform the LA of
their educational provision. A written statement of educational
provision, or any other reasonable form of information, should be
adequate.
It may be helpful at this stage to provide the LA with a general
outline of any plans or intentions, which may of course be flexible
and adaptable. See School is Not Compulsory (SINC) (available
from EO) ‘Timetables and Curricula’ for a sample letter
of explanations parents may use when taking a less conventional
approach. Families should feel confident to communicate their personal
style of education, however ‘different’ it is from school.
It is reasonable for families to be allowed a period of time to
establish their home education (See 'Legal aspects of home education'
in the EO information leaflet series). This may be particularly
necessary if the child has experienced problems in school.
There are no specific legal requirements about the extent and
nature of contact with the LA. Individual LAs may have their own
guidelines, but these do not have the force of law and in the end
such contact is open to negotiation. Many LEAs have revised their
literature and procedures in consultation with the recognised experts
in the field: home educators and home education organisations.
LA Personnel
The person with the greatest responsibility in the Local Authority
is the Director of Education; other titles may be used. Under this
office the LA is divided into the inspectors and advisers with their
manager, and the education social workers and education welfare
officers with their manager. There are further special services
provided within the LA. Information about local services and who
LA officials are in your area can be obtained from council offices
or reference libraries.
Home educating families may have contact (by letter or by appointment)
with either main branch of the LA, or both. First contact may sometimes
be from the welfare side to reassure the LA as to the genuine intent
on the part of the parents to home educate. Unless the Education
Welfare Officer also has the job of Home Education consultant/etc.
that is where contact with the Education Welfare Department should
end.
Sometimes an EWO will turn up unannounced at the door with the
idea of reassuring the LA as to the child's general well-being.
Legally parents do not have to give the EWO admission to the house
if they would rather not.
LAs do have a duty to consider welfare issues which may arise
in the course of carrying out their functions. However, this does
not give LAs additional rights to insist on home visits to assess
educational provision, which should be considered separately from
the child’s general welfare.
Providing information to the LA
Case law has established that LAs are entitled to ask informally
for information about the home education arrangements made by parents.
However, the same case law advises parents to respond reasonably
to such requests.
The way this information is provided is open to negotiation with
the LA. We suggest that some alternative methods are:
- written reports
- samples of work
- home visits, with or without the child
- meetings held elsewhere, with or without the child
- endorsement by a recognised third party
- information provided in any other appropriate form
Contact with the LA should embody a positive two-way dialogue.
If the LA is trying to insist upon a form of assessment which seems
unreasonable, even if it is in line with their own guidelines, then
parents should seek advice.
Some individual officers, less experienced in working with a broad
range of educational approaches, may expect a school-type approach
(specific timetable, curriculum, records of pupil progress, tests
etc.) but as mentioned earlier there are no legal requirements at
all for such an approach. It is important, however, for LAs to be
reassured that the education being provided at home is suitable
for the individual requirements of that particular child.
Parents who have decided to work less formally may like to keep
an education diary, jotting things down as they happen. This does
not need to be detailed. A note can be made of books read, and activities
undertaken. This would help to provide information on educational
progress for any further contact with the LA, and also remind the
family themselves just how much education takes place through visits
to places of interest, play, reading, conversations, project work,
watching science programmes on TV, formal studies, going to special
interest clubs perhaps with EO friends, listening to the News, fossil
hunting, attending sports clubs, the Youth Theatre, holiday activities,
courses offered by education establishments, etc.
Parents can extract information from the diary for use in their
report. (Such information may be divided along subject lines even
though the learning itself may not have such a structure). A report
or statement of educational provision written by parents ensures
that the LA will have accurate information on their file.
If a home visit is chosen, it is also useful to have any questions
ready as the advisers/consultants may have useful ideas to offer.
Bear in mind, however, that most LA officials have only a standard
‘school type’ experience of education and may not appreciate
the range of approaches available to home educators. Good preparation
for LA visits can mean that a accurate summary of actual educational
provision is recorded, rather than an officer’s interpretation.
Once the LA have established that suitable education is taking
place, then further visits to the home or requests for detailed
information are beyond the call of the law. If the LA are concerned
about keeping their records up to date, a simple questionnaire sent
to the family on an annual basis, asking if they are still home
educating, should be quite sufficient.
Style of Assessments
Given the diverse approach to home education, and the fact that
many children will work in an individual way, how then do LA officers
proceed with assessments? Various cases which have been through
the courts have established useful precedents. One such case was
the Harrison v Stevenson Appeal to Worcester Crown Court
1981, which was mainly concerned with investigating the viability
of alternative approaches to education and LA assessment of such,
in which it was stated that the appellants had not permitted LEA
assessments to take place. One reason given for this was that Mrs
Harrison “felt such assessments would put pressure on the
children so as to undermine their confidence and set back their
development”. This is a real concern for some families. The
judge observed:
“We accept that an assessment in the nature of a formal
examination might have had the results feared by Mrs Harrison.
We can see no reason why assessment should have taken such a
form, or have been made in a formal setting.”
Also noted was that other expert witnesses had been able to make
assessments for their own purposes and in their own way. If LA officers
are not happy with the educational provision on the basis of information
provided by the parent (either at a visit or by other means), they
must put this in writing with an explanation of their opinions.
Parents then have time to rectify the situation, provide additional
information, or explain why they disagree with the conclusions.
Usually any problems can be resolved easily.
LAs’ Varied Attitudes to Home education
In 1994 a survey was conducted for Stockport Education Authority
and the results, published in a paper Education Otherwise: The
LEA's role in Home Education (1996), showed a wide variation
in the approach of different LAs to the monitoring and support of
families choosing to home-educate. The author, Richard Bates, sought
to identify good LA practice and noted how effective this was when
combined with active and effective communication with our charity
Education Otherwise. The essential difference in attitudes is summarised
as follows:
“Some LEAs feel that the existence of this form of education
is a mistake ... and (in view of this) provide formal mechanisms
to monitor the home education, with the aim of admitting or
returning the home-educated pupils to the school system as soon
as possible. Characteristics of this response are a bureaucratic
approach to the families concerned, a rigid view of what satisfactory
education entails and an absence of support functions...”
“Other LEAs ... even though they may believe powerfully
that the schools in the Authority offer a first-class education
... adopt a more conciliatory and supportive stance towards
home education. Such approaches may be due to a belief in the
value of choice through diversity: that in a democracy families
should have the right to decide how to educate their own children:
that this responsibility should not be assumed against the wishes
of the parents.” (p.18)
In fact many LAs in the latter category encourage families to
contact EO about home-education where a child is becoming anxious
about going to school. As this saves further distress, the possibility
of the child returning to school at a later date (if this is what
the family would prefer) also remains an option.
Education Otherwise - the charity, or 'education otherwise'
by LAs
Education Otherwise (EO) is a charitable membership organisation
which provides information and support for parents who choose to
provide a home-based education for their children in place of school
attendance. The charity is supported by academics and by many groups
and individuals who appreciate the need for a range of options in
education in order to cater for the inherent diversity of young
people.
‘Education Otherwise’ is a trade mark registered by
EO on 15 July 1998 under Reg. No. 2172166. Some LAs still use this
term for department or personnel titles, creating the impression
that the charity Education Otherwise has a department within the
LA. This should be challenged.
‘Education otherwise’ is also sometimes used by LAs
when referring to all children learning out of school for reasons
such as exclusion, pregnancy, ill health or attendance at off-site
units. The Department for Education Circular No. 11/94 The Education
by LEAs of Children Otherwise than at School was written specifically
with these students in mind; not children in families who
have chosen home education.
In practice, elective home educating families sometimes find themselves
confronted by officials mistakenly applying the substance of the
Circular (with its emphasis is on intervention and an early return
to mainstream schooling) to their situation. This is not appropriate.
The Circular itself states unequivocally (paragraph 2) that it
“does not offer guidance on the education of children
otherwise than at school which is conducted by parents voluntarily
in accordance with section 36 of the Education Act 1944, usually
at home” (this is now section 7 of the Education Act 1996).
Relationships between LAs and Home-educating Families
There is more to be done to develop relationships of mutual respect
between LAs and home educators. Where good communication does take
place, happy relationships usually result. Some LAs take a more
creative approach to education: e.g. initiating and co-ordinating
alternative projects, offering guidance and support, and providing
protection for those in genuine need. LAs’ active promotion
of diverse educational provision could also help to ensure that
they remain involved at the heart of true educational progress.
In the words of a letter sent by a senior education welfare officer
to an EO member:
“... I feel very much that we should have a close and
fruitful relationship, particularly as we are both looking to
achieve the same aim, which is the best education for children.”
This leaflet is from the Education Otherwise Information Leaflet
Series.
This series is only a guide, not an authoritative statement of law
or procedures (updated Nov. 2004).
Reference: ‘Education Otherwise’ The LEA’s Role
in Home Education 1996 (Richard Bates) from EMIE, The Mere, Upton
Park, Slough, Berkshire SL1 2DQ.
Email: emie@nfer.ac.uk Tel: 01753 523156
Education Otherwise Association Limited
PO Box 325, Kings Lynn, PE34 3XW
Website: www.education-otherwise.org
Help Line: 0870 7300074
Registered Charity Number: 1055120
|